Feedback request: Mentha aquatica (36315)

[dawn nelson]

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #361575

Taxon:	Mentha aquatica x arvensis var paludosa named by J Fraser 1930 extensive printed id note
Other name:	Lamiaceae: Mentha aquatica L. ("Water Mint")
Filed in taxon folder:	Lamiaceae: Mentha aquatica L. ("Water Mint")
Collected by:	Rev Rowland John Burdon Mr Joseph Edward Little
Collection date:	14/8/1929
Locality:	Great Britain, VC13 West Sussex, Linch, SU82
ex herb:	Mr Job Edward Lousley
exchanged:	Watson Botanical Exchange Club
Institution:	South London Botanical Institute (SLBI)
Image:

Inferred details are marked.

Documented by shaw30 on 4^th April 2013.

Edit history

date	user	change
22/05/2013	dawn nelson	Deleted determination (orig): Mentha aquatica
22/05/2013	dawn nelson	Added determination (conf): Mentha aquatica on 1930
22/05/2013	dawn nelson	Added determination (orig): Mentha aquatica x arvensis var paludosa
22/05/2013	dawn nelson	Added determiner: J Fraser
22/05/2013	dawn nelson	Added determiner's note: extensive printed id note
22/05/2013	dawn nelson	Deleted determination (orig): Mentha aquatica x arvensis var paludosa
22/05/2013	dawn nelson	Deleted determination (conf): Mentha aquatica on 1930
22/05/2013	dawn nelson	Added determination (orig): Mentha aquatica x arvensis var paludosa on 1930
22/05/2013	dawn nelson	Added determination (conf): Mentha aquatica
22/05/2013	dawn nelson	Added determiner's note: extensive printed id note
22/05/2013	dawn nelson	Deleted determiner: J Fraser
22/05/2013	dawn nelson	Added determiner: J Fraser

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.

User comments about this sheet

dawn nelson wrote

Should this determination be changed?

[oldnick]

I would say so (see also http://herbariaunited.org/core/forum/viewtopic.php?t=10424