Feedback request: Cerastium vulgatum (30010)

[oldnick]

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #299774

Taxon:	Cerastium vulgatum sensu L.(1759), non L.(1755)
Filed in taxon folder:	Cerastium vulgatum sensu L.(1759), non L.(1755)
Collected by:	R F
Collection date:	6/1852
Locality:	Great Britain, VC39 Staffordshire, Harborne, SP08, Fields
Institution:	University of Birmingham (BIRM)
Image:
fruits/flowers:	mature flowers

Inferred details are marked.

Documented by nacs12 on 28^th May 2010.

Checked by oldnick

Edit history

date	user	change
23/09/2013	oldnick	Added collector: R F [illegible]
23/09/2013	oldnick	Added locality: GB VC39 Harborne, Fields SP08 (place)
23/09/2013	oldnick	Deleted collector: R F
23/09/2013	oldnick	Deleted locality: GB VC37,VC38,VC39 Harborne, Fields
24/09/2013	chrisu	Added locality: GB VC39 Harborne, Fields
24/09/2013	chrisu	Deleted locality: GB VC39 Harborne, Fields SP08 (place)

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.

User comments about this sheet

oldnick wrote

This seems doubtless ex herb RCR Jordan, compare http://herbariaunited.org/specimen/281936/ The collector 'Rf' also on http://herbariaunited.org/specimen/261924/ could be Rufus his brother possibly???

[David Price]

I think the label says "Gathered by RJ" not RF (note the capital F in "Fields").

The typed transcriptions cannot be trusted.

[David Price]

I think the label says "Gathered by RJ" not RF (note the capital F in "Fields").

The typed transcriptions cannot be trusted.

[oldnick]

Although not R F (the option on the menu) could it be Rf ?