This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.
Specimen #282689
Taxon: | Dioscoreaceae: Tamus communis L. ("Black Bryony") |
---|
Filed in taxon folder: | Dioscoreaceae: Tamus communis L. ("Black Bryony") |
---|
Locality: | Beuly
|
---|
communicated: | Prof George Stephen West |
---|
Institution: | University of Birmingham (BIRM) |
---|
Image: | |
---|
fruits/flowers: | mature flowers |
---|
notes: | No details, apart from: "(Di).scor(eac)eae ....(co)mmunis", "Male", "Bell Bryony", "Burly?" |
---|
Documented by mikedaps on 12th November 2009.
Edit history
date | user | change |
---|
17/10/2013 | oldnick | Deleted note: No details, apart from: "(Di).scor(eac)eae ....(co)mmunis", "Male", "Beil Bryony", "Burly?" |
17/10/2013 | oldnick | Added note: No details, apart from: "(Di).scor(eac)eae ....(co)mmunis", "Male", "Bell Bryony", "Burly?" |
17/10/2013 | oldnick | Deleted locality: |
17/10/2013 | oldnick | Added locality: Beuly |
28/12/2015 | oldnick | Deleted locality: Beuly |
28/12/2015 | oldnick | Added locality: Beuly [illegible] |
N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.
Log-in to edit this sheet.
User comments about this sheet
- oldnick wrote
- Place?? there are 2 similar sheets of Tamus from Bingley - but the place written quite differently! http://herbariaunited.org/specimen/297149/?image