help | home | search messages | profile

@home Message Board

Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages
Feedback request: Carex elata (47300)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    herbariaunited.org Forum Index -> Herbarium sheet discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Stephen Lemon



Joined: 07 Jan 2015
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2016 3:01 pm    Post subject: Feedback request: Carex elata (47300) Reply with quote

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #397496

Taxon:Cyperaceae: Carex nigra x elata = C. x turfosa Fr.
uncertain identification by Stephen Lemon 12/2/2016

There are good indications that this and the same specimens on the associate sheet are a hybrid with Carex nigra (lack of fibrillae, variable bract length).

Other name:Cyperaceae: Carex elata All. ("Tufted-sedge")
det. Almquist

"Carex stricta var. (probably)" teste Dr. Almquist.

Filed in taxon folder:Cyperaceae: Carex elata All. ("Tufted-sedge")
Collected by:Mr William Hadden Beeby
Collection date:21/6/1885
Locality:Great Britain, VC17 Surrey, Hedgecourt Lake, TQ3540, north end of Hedge Court mill-pond, Surrey
ex herb:Mr William Hadden Beeby
Institution:South London Botanical Institute (SLBI)
Image:Carex nigra x elata = C. x turfosa herbarium specimen from Hedgecourt Lake, VC17 Surrey in 1885 by Mr William Hadden Beeby.Carex nigra x elata = C. x turfosa herbarium specimen from Hedgecourt Lake, VC17 Surrey in 1885 by Mr William Hadden Beeby.
collector's number:211
fruits/flowers:mature flowers
notes:A.Fryer would certainly refer to stricta. See letter Feb. 1866.
Filing note:Carex hudsonii

Documented by siandef on 10th August 2015.

Edit history

dateuserchange
12/02/2016stephen lemonDeleted determination (orig): Carex elata
12/02/2016stephen lemonAdded determination (uncertain): Carex nigra x elata = C. x turfosa on 12/2/2016
12/02/2016stephen lemonAdded determination (det): Carex elata
12/02/2016stephen lemonAdded determiner: Mr William Hadden Beeby
12/02/2016stephen lemonAdded determiner: Stephen Lemon
12/02/2016stephen lemonAdded determiner's note: The variable bract size on sheet specimen and reference to lack of fibrillae are strongly suggestive of a Carex nigra hybrid.
19/07/2016stephen lemonAdded note: A.Fryer would certainly refer to stricta. See letter Feb. 1866.
19/07/2016stephen lemonDeleted locality: GB VC17 Hedge Court Pond, north end
19/07/2016stephen lemonAdded locality: GB VC17 Hedgecourt Lake, north end of Hedge Court mill-pond, Surrey TQ3540 (place)
19/07/2016stephen lemonDeleted determiner: Mr William Hadden Beeby
19/07/2016stephen lemonAdded determiner: Dr Almquist (Dr. Almquist)
19/07/2016stephen lemonDeleted determiner's note: The variable bract size on sheet specimen and reference to lack of fibrillae are strongly suggestive of a Carex nigra hybrid.
19/07/2016stephen lemonAdded determiner's note: "Carex stricta var. (probably)" teste Dr. Almquist.
19/07/2016stephen lemonAdded determiner's note: There are good indications that this and the same specimens on the associate sheet are a hybrid with Carex nigra (lack of fibrillae, variable bract length).
19/07/2016stephen lemonAdded attribute collector's number: 211
19/07/2016stephen lemonDeleted determiner's note: There are good indications that this and the same specimens on the associate sheet are a hybrid with Carex nigra (lack of fibrillae, variable bract length).
19/07/2016stephen lemonDeleted determiner's note: "Carex stricta var. (probably)" teste Dr. Almquist.
19/07/2016stephen lemonAdded determiner's note: There are good indications that this and the same specimens on the associate sheet are a hybrid with Carex nigra (lack of fibrillae, variable bract length).
19/07/2016stephen lemonAdded determiner's note: "Carex stricta var. (probably)" teste Dr. Almquist.

Specimen #404316

Taxon:Cyperaceae: Carex nigra x elata = C. x turfosa Fr.
uncertain identification by Stephen Lemon 12/2/2016

There are good indications that this and the same specimens on the associate sheet are a hybrid with Carex nigra (lack of fibrillae, variable bract length).

Other name:Cyperaceae: Carex elata All. ("Tufted-sedge")
det. Almquist

"Carex stricta, var.-probably" Dr. Almquist in litt. to A.Bennett, on the same plant colld 21.6.1885, bearing, I believe Mr Bennett's number 138. (My number 211)

Filed in taxon folder:Cyperaceae: Carex elata All. ("Tufted-sedge")
Collected by:Mr William Hadden Beeby
Collection date:11/7/1886
Locality:Great Britain, VC17 Surrey, Hedgecourt Lake, TQ3540, The plant forms large, dense, tufts; but I can detect no fibrillae at the base of stem. The plant is usually submerged, + Mr Alfred Fryer thinks that when this is the case, the fibrillae are often absent. If the further specimens enable a definite opinion
ex herb:Mr William Hadden Beeby
Institution:South London Botanical Institute (SLBI)
collector's number:240 (or 211?)
fruits/flowers:seeds/fruits
notes:Propter margines foliorum siccitaterevolutus haec forma ad C. strictam est referena; fructuo habitusque, E. Goodenoughiis in memoriam revocantur, var. turfosum (Fr. p[ro] p[arte]) Almqu. indicant. At maxime memorabilis, quod, quamquam caespitose crescit, fibrillae desunt, quod non nisi in solitariis specimenibus vidi. Num in loco natali transitus in C. strictam typicam invenire liceat – [??] hybrida stricta x goodenowi visenda - Hac res in vivo exploranda. S. Almquist [Because the margins of the leaves in a dried state are revolute, this form is referable to C. stricta [= C. elata]; the fruits and habit, recalling C. Goodenowii [C.nigra], indicate var. turfosum (Fr. p.p [= pro parte, in part)] Almqu[ist]] . But then, most memorably [noticeably], although it is growing in tufts, fibrils are lacking, which I have seen only in solitary specimens. Whether in its place of origin a transition to typical C. stricta may be allowable – and the hybrid stricta x goodenowii is to be discovered - this issue is to be explored in living material. S. Almquist]
Filing note:Carex hudsonii

Documented by stephen lemon on 19th July 2016.

Edit history

dateuserchange
19/07/2016stephen lemonAdded note: Propter margines foliorum siccitaterevolutus haec forma ad C. strictam est referena; fructuo habitusque, E. Goodenoughiis in memoriam revocantur, var. turfosum (Fr. p[ro] p[arte]) Almqu. indicant. At maxime memorabilis, quod, quamquam caespitose crescit, fibrillae desunt, quod non nisi in solitariis specimenibus vidi. Num in loco natali transitus in C. strictam typicam invenire liceat – [??] hybrida stricta x goodenowi visenda - Hac res in vivo exploranda. S. Almquist [Because the margins of the leaves in a dried state are revolute, this form is referable to C. stricta [= C. elata]; the fruits and habit, recalling C. Goodenowii [C.nigra], indicate var. turfosum (Fr. p.p [= pro parte, in part)] Almqu[ist]] . But then, most memorably [noticeably], although it is growing in tufts, fibrils are lacking, which I have seen only in solitary specimens. Whether in its place of origin a transition to typical C. stricta may be allowable – and the hybrid stricta x goodenowii is to be discovered - this issue is to be explored in living material. S. Almquist]
19/07/2016stephen lemonDeleted determiner's note: There are good indications that this and the same specimens on the associate sheet are a hybrid with Carex nigra (lack of fibrillae, variable bract length).
19/07/2016stephen lemonDeleted determiner's note: "Carex stricta, var.-probably" Dr. Almquist in litt. to A.Bennett, on the same plant colld 21.6.1885, bearing, I believe Mr Bennett's number 138. (My number 211)
19/07/2016stephen lemonAdded determiner's note: There are good indications that this and the same specimens on the associate sheet are a hybrid with Carex nigra (lack of fibrillae, variable bract length).
19/07/2016stephen lemonAdded determiner's note: "Carex stricta, var.-probably" Dr. Almquist in litt. to A.Bennett, on the same plant colld 21.6.1885, bearing, I believe Mr Bennett's number 138. (My number 211)

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.


User comments about this sheet

stephen lemon wrote
Can anyone translate the Latin text or is the base of the sheet the translation? This is another potential hybrid that may be confirmed from an examination of the actual specimen.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Roger Horton



Joined: 02 Oct 2012
Posts: 1545
Location: Cambridge, UK

PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The second image with its text is not easily accessible at the moment. Latin scholars should look HERE!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    herbariaunited.org Forum Index -> Herbarium sheet discussion All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group