Feedback request: Galeopsis segetum (20433)

[keith barnett]

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #255781

Taxon:	Lamiaceae: Galeopsis segetum Neck. ("Downy Hemp-nettle") named by Timothy C G Rich
Filed in taxon folder:	Lamiaceae: Galeopsis segetum Neck. ("Downy Hemp-nettle")
Collected by:	Mr John Edwards Griffith
Collection date:	9/1895
Locality:	Great Britain, VC49 Caernarvonshire, Fodol Farm, SH5468
ex herb:	Rev. Augustin Ley Botanical Exchange Club of The British Isles
Institution:	University of Birmingham (BIRM)
Image:
notes:	Near Bangor.
Filing note:	Galeopsis ochroleuca

Assimilated from an external database by BIRMherb.

Edit history

date	user	change
03/09/2008	<system> (minor automatic edit)	Deleted collector: Mr J E Griffith
03/09/2008	<system> (minor automatic edit)	Added collector: Mr John Edwards Griffith
03/09/2008	keith barnett	Added provenance: exherb Rev. Augustin Ley
03/09/2008	keith barnett	Added provenance: exherb (Botanical Exchange Club of The British Isles)
03/09/2008	keith barnett	Replaced number: BIRM.tpd.temp.1157

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.

User comments about this sheet

keith barnett wrote

I can't see (on review) where Fodol Farm comes from: another sheet?

[Tom Humphrey]

Hi Keith,
Thanks for your query about this. I think Fodol Farm [Vodal Farm] is probably inferred from other sheets collected around the same time.

This record was imported into the system from a database of several thousand BIRM specimens catalogued by Alex Lockton - (the images are newly attached to pre-existing records). It's is possible that there could be occasional mismatches between the sheet images and the textual record - if you find records of that type then please let me know - but in this case I don't think that's happened.

For the time being I should probably exclude the imported sheets from 'review' - as they are likely to be correct (although at some point it may be worth adding in the provenance info, as you have done with this sheet).

regards,

Tom