Feedback request: Hypericum montanum (WISE.1.141)

[keith barnett]

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #241990

Taxon:	Clusiaceae: Hypericum montanum L. ("Pale St John's-wort") confirmed by Leonard John Margetts 15/1/1978
Filed in taxon folder:	Clusiaceae: Hypericum montanum L. ("Pale St John's-wort")
Collected by:	J Taylor
Locality:	Great Britain, Hampshire, woods Great Britain, VC3 South Devon, Ivybridge, SX65, About Ivybridge Devon, woods in Hampshire
Institution:	Launceston Museum (LAUS)
Image:
fruits/flowers:	mature flowers
notes:	"258" at top left of page. "(Mountain St. Johns Wort) written under original taxon.

Inferred details are marked.

Documented by rudolfthered on 20^th December 2007.

Edit history

date	user	change
22/12/2007	tom humphrey	Deleted locality: GB VC11,VC12 Hampshire, about in hedge Devon/ woods in Hampshire
22/12/2007	tom humphrey	Added locality: GB VC11,VC12 Hampshire, woods
22/12/2007	tom humphrey	Added locality: GB VC3 Ivybridge
26/09/2008	wenben	Deleted locality: GB VC3 Ivybridge
26/09/2008	wenben	Added locality: GB VC3 Ivybridge, About Ivybridge Devon, woods in Hampshire
10/11/2008	keith barnett	Deleted locality: GB VC11,VC12 Hampshire, woods
10/11/2008	keith barnett	Added locality: GB VC11,VC12, woods
16/02/2016	oldnick	Deleted determination (orig): Hypericum montanum on 15/1/1978
16/02/2016	oldnick	Added determination (conf): Hypericum montanum on 15/1/1978
16/02/2016	oldnick	Deleted provenance: exherb William Wise
16/02/2016	oldnick	Deleted determiner: Leonard John Margetts
16/02/2016	oldnick	Added determiner: Leonard John Margetts

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.

User comments about this sheet

keith barnett wrote

on review, not sure how best to deal with this curious sheet: only one specimen, which can hardly be from both Devon and Hants!