This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.
Documented by keith barnett on 25th February 2009.
Edit history
date | user | change |
---|
15/03/2009 | tom humphrey | Deleted determination (orig): Dactylorhiza incarnata |
15/03/2009 | tom humphrey | Added determination (orig): Dactylorhiza incarnata |
15/03/2009 | tom humphrey | Added determination (orig): Dactylorhiza praetermissa on 9/3/2009 |
15/03/2009 | tom humphrey | Added determiner: Colin Pope |
15/03/2009 | tom humphrey | Added determiner's note: GOD |
06/02/2014 | geoff toone | Deleted locality: GB VC10 Appuldurcombe, Appuldurcombe Park |
06/02/2014 | geoff toone | Added locality: GB VC10 Appuldurcombe, Appuldurcombe Park SZ5480 (place) |
06/02/2014 | geoff toone | Deleted determiner's note: I think this is likely to to be D. praetermissa. The two taxa were much confused and we have no verified records for D. incarnata from vc 10. |
06/02/2014 | geoff toone | Added determiner's note: I think this is likely to to be D. praetermissa. The two taxa were much confused and we have no verified records for D. incarnata from vc 10. |
N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.
Log-in to edit this sheet.
User comments about this sheet
- colinpope wrote
- I think this is likely to to be D. praetermissa. The two taxa were much confused and we have no verified records for D. incarnata from vc 10.