help | home | search messages | profile

@home Message Board

Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages
Feedback request: Persicaria maculosa (11885)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    herbariaunited.org Forum Index -> Herbarium sheet discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
hallucigenia



Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 1739

PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 5:18 pm    Post subject: Feedback request: Persicaria maculosa (11885) Reply with quote

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #277949

Taxon:Polygonaceae: Persicaria maculosa Gray ("Redshank")
Filed in taxon folder:Polygonaceae: Persicaria maculosa Gray ("Redshank")
Collected by:Rev. Augustin Ley
Collection date:30/9/1883
Locality:Great Britain, VC35,VC36, Garway Mill, SO452214, Banks of River Monnow near Garway mill
ex herb:Rev. Augustin Ley
Institution:University of Birmingham (BIRM)
Image:Persicaria maculosa herbarium specimen from Garway Mill, VC35,VC36 in 1883 by Rev. Augustin Ley.
fruits/flowers:seeds/fruits
notes:Some spec[imen]s more ram[ose?] only slightly glandular; styles 1/2 united. All were growing together and I believe represent only one sp. I now think two are mac[ulatum] and two [P.] Pers[icaria] or biforme. These two biforme.
Filing note:Polygonum persicaria var

Documented by hallucigenia on 11th July 2009.

Checked by keith barnett

Edit history

dateuserchange
11/07/2009tom humphreyDeleted locality: GB VC36 Garway mill, Banks of River Monmow Near Garway mill
11/07/2009tom humphreyAdded locality: GB VC35,VC36 Garway Mill, Banks of River Monnow near Garway mill SO452214 (place)
12/07/2009hallucigeniaDeleted note: Scrir?? and face. More, rnu?? only slightly glandular : Styles 1/2 united all were growing together I believe represent only one I P[lant][?]
I now think two are more, two pers, or biforme there two biforme
12/07/2009hallucigeniaAdded note: Some spec[imen]s more ram[ose?] only slightly glandular; styles 1/2 united. All were growing together and I believe represent only one sp. I now think two are mac[ulatum] and two [P.] Pers[icaria] or biforme. These two biforme.
18/02/2010keith barnettDeleted attribute flowerField: immature
18/02/2010keith barnettAdded attribute flowerField: fruiting

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.


User comments about this sheet

hallucigenia wrote
Word Scair??and rnu run?? please


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mossysal



Joined: 29 Oct 2007
Posts: 1669

PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 9:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some spec[imen]s more ram[ose?] only slightly glandular; styles 1/2 united. All were growing together and I believe represent only one sp. I now think two are mac[ulatum] and two [P.] Pers[icaria] or biforme. These two biforme.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hallucigenia



Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 1739

PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Many thanks I really do have problems with his writing!
C
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    herbariaunited.org Forum Index -> Herbarium sheet discussion All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group