This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.
Specimen #280967
Taxon: | Rubus balfourianus named by Andrew S Doran 8/6/2009Holotype. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 19: 86. 1847
|
---|
Filed in taxon folder: | Rubus balfourianus |
---|
Collected by: | Rev Andrew Bloxam |
---|
Collection date: | 1846
|
---|
Locality: | Great Britain, VC38 Warwickshire, Rugby, SP57
|
---|
Institution: | Charterhouse School Herbarium (GOD) |
---|
Image: | |
---|
phenologyField: | FL-M,FL-O |
---|
typeSpecimenField: | holotype |
---|
notes: | Mr Babington observes of this and the accompanying variety "I think they are the same species, but they do not agree well with R. salteri having rounder barren stem and decompound panicles. The numerous setae on the panicle is another difference, as R. salteri has none. The lower leaflets seem sessile & not overlapping the intermediate pair, the former point separates it from R. salteri, the latter from R. coryfolius from which also it differs by its glandular panicle. They seem nearly allied to macrophyllus & may perhaps be a new species." |
---|
Inferred details are marked.
Documented by tom humphrey on 24th October 2009.
Edit history
date | user | change |
---|
24/10/2009 | tom humphrey | Added attribute phenologyField: FL-M,FL-O |
26/10/2009 | andrew doran | Deleted note: Mr Babington observes of this and the accompanying variety "I think they are the same species, but they do not agree well with R. salteri having rounder barren stem and decompound panicles. The numerous ??? on the panicle is another difference, as R. salteri has none. The lower leaflets seem ??? & not overlapping the intermediate pair, the former point separates it from R. salteri, the latter from R. coryfolius from which also it differs by its glandular panicle. They seem nearly allied to macrophyllus & may perhaps be a new species." |
26/10/2009 | andrew doran | Added note: Mr Babington observes of this and the accompanying variety "I think they are the same species, but they do not agree well with R. salteri having rounder barren stem and decompound panicles. The numerous setae on the panicle is another difference, as R. salteri has none. The lower leaflets seem sessile & not overlapping the intermediate pair, the former point separates it from R. salteri, the latter from R. coryfolius from which also it differs by its glandular panicle. They seem nearly allied to macrophyllus & may perhaps be a new species." |
26/10/2009 | andrew doran | Deleted determiner's note: Holotype. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 19: 86. 1847 |
26/10/2009 | andrew doran | Added determiner's note: UC |
N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.
Log-in to edit this sheet.
User comments about this sheet
- andrew doran wrote
- Nr. Rugby