Feedback request: Achillea millefolium (5401)

[keith barnett]

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #231508

Taxon:	Asteraceae: Achillea millefolium L. ("Yarrow")
Other name:	Achillea millefolium var. villosum
Filed in taxon folder:	Asteraceae: Achillea millefolium L. ("Yarrow")
Collected by:	Mr George Claridge Druce
Collection date:	7/1920 7/1930
Locality:	Great Britain, VC112 Shetland, Sandwick, HU42
ex herb:	Mr George Claridge Druce
Institution:	Manchester Museum (MANCH)
Accession number:	Kk939
Image:
fruits/flowers:	mature flowers

Inferred details are marked.

Documented by keith barnett on 16^th February 2007.

Checked by tom humphrey

Edit history

date	user	change
20/10/2011	oldnick	Added notes
20/10/2011	oldnick	Deleted locality: GB VC112 Sandwich
20/10/2011	oldnick	Added locality: GB VC112 Sandwick
21/10/2011	sir_caronte	Added determination (orig): Achillea millefolium var villosum
21/10/2011	sir_caronte	Deleted note: var villosum
21/10/2011	sir_caronte	Added collection date: 7/1930
21/10/2011	sir_caronte	Added attribute flowerField: flowering

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.

User comments about this sheet

keith barnett wrote

more problems with photo, can't control it!

[Tom Humphrey]

Hi Keith,

I'm sorry that you've still encountered problems. I'm fairly hopeful that things will work now after the changes today.

• I've corrected two bugs which may have lead to excess memory being used after many sheets had been viewed.
  
  
• Images will be sent more quickly now as all the required thumbnails are pre-generated.
  
  
• The initial image sent is now smaller (in terms of absolute resolution) but of higher quality, and may use considerable less memory in some web browsers. Consequently, the appearance of the low resolution (unzoomed) sheet images has improved even though the overall amount of image data sent has slightly reduced.
  

Please let me know if images are still fragmenting now (also if anyone else experiences this problem then please follow up this post or email me).