Possible two species on one sheet.

[mossysal]

Hi, Tom,
These two queries of mine have slipped through the net and I would be grateful for a ruling please.
The Avena sheet has the second taxon put in by Ley for comparison so is not important, but I think that the Triglochin one has T. maritimum on it as well as T. palustre (and so did H.S.T!). If this is the case should it be re-mounted?
http://herbariaunited.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2481 and
http://herbariaunited.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2472
Regards
Sarah

[mossysal]

http://herbariaunited.org/atHomeForm/?release=6804c4bd30dd4408527ce3362b4403f9&edit=264707

Here is another one. What should be done about this?
Sarah

[Tom Humphrey]

Hi Sarah,

Thanks for posting about this. I think mixed sheets should be documented as such - please feel free to change taxon names that are not correct. Ideally such sheets should be remounted but I don't have easy access to the collections to do so, but it should be possible to generate a list of sheets containing mixed taxa in need of remounting, so that remounting can be done later.

I've updated the Triglochin sheet. I agree with you that the Avena fatua specimen is best to ignore as there is insufficient info to document it separately.

I can't access the third link you've posted, it may still be allocated to you (or someone else).

regards,

Tom

[mossysal]

Thanks very much, Tom.
I'm sorry for hanging onto the Carex pulicaris etc sheet.
Now released.
I will have a go if you are happy for me to do the usual multiple specimens on one sheet.
Sarah