This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.
Documented by oldnick on 30th November 2009.
Checked by mossysal
Edit history
Documented by oldnick on 30th November 2009.
Checked by mossysal
Documented by oldnick on 30th November 2009.
Checked by mossysal
Documented by oldnick on 30th November 2009.
Checked by mossysal
Documented by oldnick on 30th November 2009.
Checked by mossysal
Edit history
N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.
Log-in to edit this sheet.
User comments about this sheet
- oldnick wrote
- Did West collect any or all of these? Esholt 1878 is OK for date & locality; Ashley is a less likely locality, he would have been only 13 then & I find no other collections near that date except the more doubtful 1858 Lamiastrum galeobdolon (Bingley); the Great Elm is wrong area and wrong handwriting. Esholt has the most characteristic handwriting.