Feedback request: Luzula forsteri x pilosa = L. x borreri (359)

[keith barnett]

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #212950

Taxon:	Luzula forsteri x pilosa = L. x borreri Bromf. ex Bab.
Filed in taxon folder:	Luzula forsteri x pilosa = L. x borreri Bromf. ex Bab.
Collected by:	Mr Arthur Bennett
Collection date:	6/1880 to 8/1880
Locality:	Cultivated Great Britain, VC17 Surrey, Croydon, TQ36, Hort. apparently in both Croydon and Devon!
ex herb:	Mr Charles Bailey Mr William Curnow
Institution:	Manchester Museum (MANCH)
Accession number:	Kk803
Image:

Inferred details are marked.

Documented by tom humphrey on 14^th May 2006.

Checked by keith barnett

Edit history

date	user	change
25/04/2006	tom humphrey	Deleted locality: GB VC17 Croydon [illegible]
25/04/2006	tom humphrey	Added locality: (cultivated) GB VC17 Croydon
25/04/2006	<system> (minor automatic edit)	Deleted provenance: exherb Mr Charles Bailey [illegible]
25/04/2006	<system> (minor automatic edit)	Deleted provenance: Mr William Curnow [illegible]
25/04/2006	<system> (minor automatic edit)	Deleted collector: Mr Arthur Bennett [illegible]
25/04/2006	tom humphrey	Added collector: Mr Arthur Bennett
25/04/2006	<system> (minor automatic edit)	Added provenance: Mr William Curnow
25/04/2006	<system> (minor automatic edit)	Added provenance: exherb Mr Charles Bailey
25/04/2006	tom humphrey	Added collection date: 6/1880 - 8/1880
24/04/2007	keith barnett	Replaced note:
24/04/2007	keith barnett	Deleted locality: (cultivated) GB VC17 Croydon
24/04/2007	keith barnett	Added locality: (cultivated) GB VC17 Croydon, Hort. apparently in both Croydon and Devon!
24/04/2007	<system> (minor automatic edit)	Deleted collector: Mr Arthur Bennett
24/04/2007	<system> (minor automatic edit)	Added collector: Mr Arthur Bennett
19/07/2007	tom humphrey	Replaced note: seems from signature that Bennett (2 't's) is correct, despite drop-down list I have noticed this before.

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.

[Tom Humphrey]

Well spotted!
I've corrected the spelling on the drop-down list and merged the two spellings together,

thanks,

Tom.