This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.
Documented by mikedaps on 21st February 2010.
Checked by oldnick
Reviewed by Sarah Stille (mossysal)
Edit history
date | user | change |
---|
21/02/2010 | mikedaps | Added note: For info: See TCG Rich's paper on distribution of A. prostratus @ http://www.watsonia.org.uk/2414Rich.pdf |
21/02/2010 | mikedaps | Added determiner: Dr Timothy C G Rich |
21/02/2010 | mikedaps | Deleted determiner's note: "I am unconvinced of these being Aspragus prostratus Dumart. either labelling confusion or possibly cultivated material" assume infers 'Asparagus officianalis subsp. prostratus' |
21/02/2010 | mikedaps | Added determiner's note: as R carpinifolius |
24/11/2011 | mossysal | Deleted determiner's note: "I am unconvinced of these being Aspragus prostratus Dumart. either labelling confusion or possibly cultivated material" assume infers 'Asparagus officianalis subsp. prostratus' |
24/11/2011 | mossysal | Added determiner's note: "I am unconvinced of these being Asparagus prostratus Dumart. either labelling confusion or possibly cultivated material" |
24/11/2011 | mossysal | Added collection date: 25/7/1881 |
24/11/2011 | mossysal | Deleted determiner's note: "I am unconvinced of these being Asparagus prostratus Dumart. either labelling confusion or possibly cultivated material" |
24/11/2011 | mossysal | Added determiner's note: "I am unconvinced of these being Asparagus prostratus Dumart. either labelling confusion or possibly cultivated material" |
22/08/2015 | oldnick | Deleted determination (orig): Asparagus officinalis on 18/11/1999 |
22/08/2015 | oldnick | Added determination (uncertain): Asparagus officinalis on 18/11/1999 |
22/08/2015 | oldnick | Deleted determiner: Dr Timothy C G Rich |
22/08/2015 | oldnick | Added determiner: Dr Timothy C G Rich |
22/08/2015 | oldnick | Added determiner's note: "I am unconvinced of these being Asparagus prostratus Dumart. either labelling confusion or possibly cultivated material" |
N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.
User comments about this sheet
- mikedaps wrote
- Given up trying to spot a determinant with initials like these "T? C? Crun???" from 1999 (or if writing isn't biro, possibly 1899). Anyone recognise it?