This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.
Documented by wonastow on 9th July 2007.
Checked by tom humphrey
Edit history
date | user | change |
---|
07/02/2008 | tom humphrey | Deleted determination (orig): Sorbus latifolia |
07/02/2008 | tom humphrey | Added determination (orig): Sorbus aria x torminalis = S. x vagensis det. by David Thomas Price on 9/7/2007 |
17/10/2008 | wonastow | Deleted note: Presented by Rev W Hunt Painter of Stirchley, Salop.
"Assuming [it is] aria x torminalis, the present plant would appear to have more aria and less torminalis in it" - E.F.Linton.
S. x vagensis (now S. x confusa) det C.M.Lovett
|
17/10/2008 | wonastow | Added note: "Assuming [it is] aria x torminalis, the present plant would appear to have more aria and less torminalis in it" - E.F.Linton.
S. x vagensis (now S. x confusa) det C.M.Lovett |
17/10/2008 | wonastow | Added collector: Rev. Augustin Ley |
N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.
Log-in to edit this sheet.
User comments about this sheet
- wonastow wrote
- Both Lovatt and Linton are correct: this specimen should be labelled S. x vagensis Wilm. but is patently introgressed with S. aria