Feedback request: Carex nigra (14017)

[Mike d'Apice]

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #296200

Taxon:	Cyperaceae: Carex nigra (L.) Reichard ("Common Sedge") named by F D Hanson 9/1955
Other name:	Carex goodenowii named by Augustin Ley 1908 "var. " not specified / missing
Filed in taxon folder:	Cyperaceae: Carex nigra (L.) Reichard ("Common Sedge")
Collected by:	Rev. Augustin Ley
Collection date:	14/7/1908
Locality:	Great Britain, VC42 Breconshire, Pentwyn reservoir, SO0515, "Sand of Pentwyn reservoir, Dolygaer, Brecon"
ex herb:	Rev. Augustin Ley
Institution:	University of Birmingham (BIRM)
Image:
fruits/flowers:	mature flowers

Documented by mikedaps on 27^th April 2010.

Checked by oldnick

Edit history

date	user	change
17/08/2016	oldnick	Deleted determination (orig): Carex nigra on 8/1955
17/08/2016	oldnick	Added determination (orig): Carex nigra on 9/1955
17/08/2016	oldnick	Deleted locality: GB VC42 Pentwyn reservoir, "Sand at Pentwyn reservoir Dolygear" SO0515 (place)
17/08/2016	oldnick	Added locality: GB VC42 Pentwyn reservoir, "Sand of Pentwyn reservoir, Dolygaer, Brecon" SO0515 (place)
17/08/2016	oldnick	Deleted determiner: Mr James Edgar Dandy
17/08/2016	oldnick	Added determiner: F D Hanson
17/08/2016	oldnick	Deleted determiner's note: "var. " not specified / missing
17/08/2016	oldnick	Deleted determiner's note: "var. " not specified / missing
17/08/2016	oldnick	Added determiner's note: "var. " not specified / missing
17/08/2016	oldnick	Added determiner's note: "var. " not specified / missing

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.

User comments about this sheet

mikedaps wrote

Not entirely convinced I've read the det correctly as J E Dandy - Anyone verify it as such or recognize/read it differently?