This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.
Specimen #306726
Taxon: | Rosaceae: Rosa obtusifolia Desv. ("Round-leaved Dog-rose") uncertain identification by J W D*I should have thought nearer to R obtusifolia. the small piece would do very well for that one, the larger piece seems to run to larger leaflets; it is one or the other species.
|
---|
Filed in taxon folder: | Rosaceae: Rosa obtusifolia Desv. ("Round-leaved Dog-rose") |
---|
Collected by: | Rev. Augustin Ley |
---|
Collection date: | 31/8/1910
|
---|
Locality: | Great Britain, VC34 West Gloucestershire, Tidenham Chase, ST59
|
---|
ex herb: | Rev. Augustin Ley |
---|
Institution: | University of Birmingham (BIRM) |
---|
Image: | |
---|
fruits/flowers: | seeds/fruits |
---|
notes: | [note re identification - JWD?] |
---|
Inferred details are marked.
Documented by oldnick on 30th August 2010.
Checked by mossysal
Edit history
date | user | change |
---|
28/11/2011 | mossysal | Deleted determination (orig): Rosa obtusifolia |
28/11/2011 | mossysal | Added determination (uncertain): Rosa obtusifolia |
28/11/2011 | mossysal | Added provenance: exherb Rev. Augustin Ley |
28/11/2011 | mossysal | Added determiner: J W D |
28/11/2011 | mossysal | Added determiner's note: *I should have thought nearer to R obtusifolia. the small piece would do very well for that one, the larger peilce seems to run to larger leaflets; it is one or the other species. |
28/11/2011 | mossysal | Deleted determiner's note: *I should have thought nearer to R obtusifolia. the small piece would do very well for that one, the larger peilce seems to run to larger leaflets; it is one or the other species. |
28/11/2011 | mossysal | Added determiner's note: *I should have thought nearer to R obtusifolia. the small piece would do very well for that one, the larger piece seems to run to larger leaflets; it is one or the other species. |
N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.
Log-in to edit this sheet.
User comments about this sheet
- oldnick wrote
- The initials on many of these Rose identifications seem to be JWD?? Also a pencil initial D. and Ley often notes the specimen was seen by WD. Any idea who? Were all these Rose sheets gathered for one person? They unusually lack herbarium names, and many seem to have been mounted somewhat uniformly and numbered