This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.
Documented by portwild on 3rd December 2009.
Edit history
Documented by portwild on 3rd December 2009.
Edit history
date | user | change |
---|
10/11/2010 | mossysal | Deleted determination (orig): Luzula forsteri x pilosa = L. x borreri |
10/11/2010 | mossysal | Added determination (orig): Luzula forsteri x pilosa = L. x borreri |
10/11/2010 | mossysal | Added determination (orig): Luzula pilosa |
10/11/2010 | mossysal | Added provenance: exherb Mr Thomas Clark |
10/11/2010 | mossysal | Added provenance: exherb Mr Harold Stuart Thompson |
10/11/2010 | mossysal | Deleted collection date: 1861 unclear |
10/11/2010 | mossysal | Added collection date: 10/5/1861 unclear |
10/11/2010 | mossysal | Deleted collection date: 10/5/1861 unclear |
10/11/2010 | mossysal | Added collection date: 10/5/1861 |
N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.
Log-in to edit this sheet.
User comments about this sheet
- mossysal wrote
- I think at least the second specimen looks like straight pilosa?