This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.
Documented by mikedaps on 13th December 2010.
Edit history
date | user | change |
---|
14/12/2010 | mikedaps | Deleted determination (det): Lotus corniculatus |
14/12/2010 | mikedaps | Added determination (orig): Lotus corniculatus |
14/12/2010 | mikedaps | Added note: No date but DEdV collected another specimen from same loc in 11/1923. |
14/12/2010 | mikedaps | Deleted locality: |
14/12/2010 | mikedaps | Added locality: GB VC39 Dudley, "Pit Bank, Dudley, Worcs" SO98 (place) |
15/10/2014 | chrisu | Deleted locality: GB VC39 Dudley, "Pit Bank, Dudley, Worcs" SO98 (place) |
15/10/2014 | chrisu | Added locality: GB VC39 Dudley, "Pit Bank" |
N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.
Log-in to edit this sheet.
User comments about this sheet
- mikedaps wrote
- "Pithurst - Dudley Idores" against locality makes no sense to me for Glouc or elsewhere and with no date can't trace where she may have been when collected, if DEdV did:- any interpretations that do?