Feedback request: Erophila majuscula (194)

[ladynicole]

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #312500

Taxon:	Brassicaceae: Erophila majuscula Jord. ("Hairy Whitlowgrass") named by James Alfred Wheldon Fide
Filed in taxon folder:	Brassicaceae: Erophila majuscula Jord. ("Hairy Whitlowgrass")
Collected by:	Mr Joseph Edward Little
Collection date:	13/4/1913
Locality:	Great Britain, VC20 Hertfordshire, Hitchin, TL12, Cart track, Purwell to Nine Springs
ex herb:	William Robert Sherrin Mr Joseph Edward Little
exchanged:	Watson Botanical Exchange Club
Institution:	South London Botanical Institute (SLBI)
Image:
fruits/flowers:	mature flowers
notes:	Annotation in type: I do not know the segregate. --E.S.M. Most of this I think belongs to the stirps E. majuscula and is perhaps E. occidentalis. --J.A.W.
Filing note:	Erophila verna var majuscula

Inferred details are marked.

Documented by ladynicole on 29^th December 2010.

Checked by hallucigenia

Edit history

date	user	change
10/06/2011	hallucigenia	Added determiner: Mr James Alfred Wheldon
10/06/2011	hallucigenia	Deleted collection date: 4/1913
10/06/2011	hallucigenia	Added collection date: 13/4/1913
10/06/2011	hallucigenia	Added determiner's note: Fide

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.

User comments about this sheet

ladynicole wrote

L.C. 110.6.bis above notation

[Tom Humphrey]

Hi Ladynicole, welcome to the project.

LC stands for 'London Catalogue' an archaic botanical catalogue system used by botanical club members when exchanging specimens. The book went through eleven editions, each using a slightly different numbering scheme. It's not worth recording this code.

regards,

Tom