View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
portwild
Joined: 01 May 2009 Posts: 182
|
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 10:46 pm Post subject: Feedback request: Lepidium campestre (1331) |
|
|
This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.
Documented by portwild on 2nd January 2011. Checked by oldnick Edit historydate | user | change |
---|
03/01/2011 | portwild | Deleted note: Hume's label seems to refer to data on the back. Is this the piece shown underneath?
Does Lewis 4566 refer to the place? | 03/01/2011 | portwild | Added notes | 03/01/2011 | portwild | Deleted collector: (Donor Unknown) | 03/01/2011 | portwild | Added collection date: 4/5/1866 | 03/01/2011 | portwild | Deleted note: Lewis 4566 is taken to mean the place and date. | 03/01/2011 | portwild | Added notes | 03/01/2011 | portwild | Deleted locality: | 03/01/2011 | portwild | Added locality: GB VC14 Lewes | 03/01/2011 | portwild | Deleted note: Lewis 4566 is taken to mean the place and date. The signature below is said to be Jos Woods (1776-1864), who collected in Lewes, but the assumed date is two years after his death. | 03/01/2011 | portwild | Added note: Lewis 4566 is taken to mean the place and date. The signature below is said to be Jos Woods (1776-1864), who collected in Lewes. From another specimen the date (4566) is interpreted as year/month/day. | 03/01/2011 | portwild | Added collector: Joseph Woods | 03/01/2011 | portwild | Deleted collection date: 4/5/1866 | 03/01/2011 | portwild | Added collection date: 6/6/1845 | 19/01/2011 | mossysal | Deleted provenance: exherb (The South London Botanical Institute) | 16/04/2013 | <system> (minor automatic edit) | Deleted collector: Joseph Woods | 16/04/2013 | <system> (minor automatic edit) | Added collector: Joseph Woods | 16/04/2013 | oldnick | Added attribute collector's number: 20581 |
N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names. Log-in to edit this sheet.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tom Humphrey Site Admin
Joined: 04 Jul 2005 Posts: 1298 Location: Wallingford, UK
|
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 11:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The 'label on the back' is the one pasted below. Quite a lot of SLBI had labels attached to the back which, if noticed are photographed. For small labels like this one, it seemed preferable to edit the images together rather than uploading the photos separately.
I'm not yet absolutely how to interpret some of Townsend's strange labelling but I think this is 'Lewis' as place and the date 4th May 1866.
Please avoid using 'Donor Unknown' as collector, just leave the field blank. 'Donor Unknown' has been used to mark some Birmingham sheets which were explicitly labelled as such. The BIRM 'donor unknown's all appear to be from a common source, so it's useful to have them marked - hopefully it will eventually be possible to trace the origin. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David Price
Joined: 05 Jul 2007 Posts: 2214
|
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2011 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pencilled name on Townsend's label is Jos Woods. There are other coll Woods ex herb Townsend specimens from Lewes (spelled "Lewis"), Sussex. See, e.g., http://herbariaunited.org/specimen/312223/ (its label has "CS" in top R/H corner).
See entry for Joseph Woods (1776-1864) in Britten & Boulger. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tom Humphrey Site Admin
Joined: 04 Jul 2005 Posts: 1298 Location: Wallingford, UK
|
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2011 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Britten & Boulger wrote: | Woods, Joseph (1776-1864): b. Stoke Newington, 24 Aug. 1776; d. Lewes, 9 Jan. 1864. Architect, F.L.S. 1801. To Lewes, 1833. ' Synopsis of Rosa,' Linn. Trans, xii. (1818). ' Tourists' Flora,' 1850. Contrib. E. Bot. 1301, 2823, 2886. Herb, at S. Lond. Bot. Institute; Roses also at Linn. Soc.: Brit. pl. at Royal Instit. Swansea. Hook. & Winch Con-. Pritz. 351. Jacks. 622. Bot. Guide, xiv. Proc. Linn. Soc. 1863-4, xxxii. Linn. Trans, vii. 201. Journ. Bot. 1864, 62, 96. R.S.C. vi. 436. Portr. by Cotman, 1822, at Linn. Soc. D.N.B. lxii. 409. Fl. Bucks, xcix. Woodsia Br. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
portwild
Joined: 01 May 2009 Posts: 182
|
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2011 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Joseph Woods died two years before the supposed collection date. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
portwild
Joined: 01 May 2009 Posts: 182
|
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2011 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On the example given by wonastow the date (interpreted as 25th June 1857) is shown as 57625. Therefore 4566 is 6th June 1845, which is within J Woods lifetime. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
petracapensis
Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 11:08 pm Post subject: An explanation of the dates used by Joseph Woods |
|
|
In A.J. Wilmott's 1949 notes on the SLBI Herbarium he writes,
"Joseph Woods used a system similar to that used by Robert Brown.
He indicated the date by putting first the last two numbers of the year, then the number or numbers of the month, and then the day of the month.
Thus 266 means June 1826 and
4366 means 6th June 1843. "
Edited by Tom to tag this post as Joseph Woods (1776-1864) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|