Feedback request: Trollius europaeus (3614)

[kkopp]

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #314651

Taxon:	Ranunculaceae: Trollius europaeus L. ("Globeflower")
Filed in taxon folder:	Ranunculaceae: Trollius europaeus L. ("Globeflower")
Collection date:	6/1837
Locality:	Great Britain, VC63 South-west Yorkshire, Halifax, SE02, "Turner Clough near Halifax"
ex herb:	Mr Roberts Leyland
Institution:	South London Botanical Institute (SLBI)
Image:
fruits/flowers:	mature flowers

Inferred details are marked.

Documented by kkopp on 7^th February 2011.

Checked by oldnick

Edit history

date	user	change
07/02/2011	tom humphrey	Deleted locality: GB VC48 Dolgellau

Specimen #314665

Taxon:	Ranunculaceae: Trollius europaeus L. ("Globeflower")
Filed in taxon folder:	Ranunculaceae: Trollius europaeus L. ("Globeflower")
Collected by:	Dr John Ralfs
Locality:	Great Britain, VC48 Merionethshire, Dolgellau, SH71
Institution:	South London Botanical Institute (SLBI)

Inferred details are marked.

Documented by tom humphrey on 7^th February 2011.

Checked by oldnick

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.

User comments about this sheet

kkopp wrote

Two specimens on page; one clearly is "2" and collected at Halifax; note above page label indicates item "1" was collected at Dolgelley (now Dolgellau) by J. Ralfs, but not clear if this is other specimen shown.

[Tom Humphrey]

With sheets like this were there are apparently multiple distinct collections, you can document the specimens separately by duplicating the entire documentation form. To do so, click the green cross icon near the top left of the form.

I agree with you that in this case it's not clear if both specimens are mounted any more.