View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
oldnick
Joined: 09 Oct 2009 Posts: 5472
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 10:20 pm Post subject: Feedback request: Ranunculus baudotii (2811) |
|
|
This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.
Documented by oldnick on 21st January 2011. Edit historyN.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names. Log-in to edit this sheet.
User comments about this sheet - oldnick wrote
- Site - I couldn't find 'Shibbington Bay' or 'Slubbington Bay'. I found no other Townsend specimens from this month.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tom Humphrey Site Admin
Joined: 04 Jul 2005 Posts: 1298 Location: Wallingford, UK
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Stubbington
I found it accidentally, having given up looking and moved on to track down Titchfield (another Townsend site).
(the only complication is that I did find a single web reference to Shibbington Warren near Kingsclere, Hampshire - but I think that's a red herring)
OS Grid reference SU541036 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dawn nelson
Joined: 24 Oct 2010 Posts: 739
|
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I found another with similar looking date and details and thought it was 1879[?] but very unsure |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chris Liffen
Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Posts: 1850
|
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2011 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
79 ?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dawn nelson
Joined: 24 Oct 2010 Posts: 739
|
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2011 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well found, yes looks like it doesn't it and that would make the collector Frederick Townsend too by the script wouldn't it? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tom Humphrey Site Admin
Joined: 04 Jul 2005 Posts: 1298 Location: Wallingford, UK
|
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2011 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Am still not entirely convinced, but the tide seems to be against me, so 79 it is! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dawn nelson
Joined: 24 Oct 2010 Posts: 739
|
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2011 4:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I suppose we will have to keep a good look out for any other FT scripted dates to see how he does his 3's and 9's |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chris Liffen
Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Posts: 1850
|
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2011 4:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I will have a look when I am at SLBI next week |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dawn nelson
Joined: 24 Oct 2010 Posts: 739
|
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2011 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chris Liffen
Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Posts: 1850
|
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2011 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
FWIW
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tom Humphrey Site Admin
Joined: 04 Jul 2005 Posts: 1298 Location: Wallingford, UK
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chris Liffen
Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Posts: 1850
|
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2011 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mmmmm ........
C |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dawn nelson
Joined: 24 Oct 2010 Posts: 739
|
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
more and more confusing |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|