This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.
Documented by nacs12 on 26th June 2010.
Edit history
Documented by nacs12 on 26th June 2010.
Edit history
N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.
Log-in to edit this sheet.
User comments about this sheet
- wonastow wrote
- My interpretation of this sheet is that the Charles Bailey provenance applies only to the Hardy specimen and likewise the G S West provenance only to the Oakeshott specimen. The two specimens appear on the same sheet only because they belong to the same species. This appears to be a curatorial policy prevalent at BIRM. If I am correct it means that the provenance of a great many specimens has been unwittingly confused by H@H volunteers ascribing to them an incorrect ex herb attribution. Does anyone agree with me? If so, we should agree a protocol.