help | home | search messages | profile

@home Message Board

Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages
Feedback request: Rubus marshallii (16887)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    herbariaunited.org Forum Index -> Herbarium sheet discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jcqstewart@...



Joined: 23 Apr 2012
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 8:22 pm    Post subject: Feedback request: Rubus marshallii (16887) Reply with quote

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #335390

Taxon:Rosaceae: Rubus marshallii Focke & W.M. Rogers
Filed in taxon folder:Rosaceae: Rubus marshallii Focke & W.M. Rogers
Collection date:8/7/1936
Locality:Great Britain, VC17 Surrey, Witley Common, SU94
ex herb:Charles Avery
Institution:South London Botanical Institute (SLBI)
Image:Rubus marshallii herbarium specimen from Witley Common, VC17 Surrey in 1936.
fruits/flowers:mature flowers

Inferred details are marked.

Documented by sheepish on 23rd April 2012.

Edit history

dateuserchange
26/04/2012stevehDeleted collector: Dr Wilhelm Olbers Focke
26/04/2012stevehDeleted locality: GB VC11 Witley Common
26/04/2012stevehAdded locality: GB VC17 Witley Common
26/04/2012stevehDeleted collector: (Rogers)
29/04/2012sheepishDeleted collector: (Focke & Rogers)
29/04/2012sheepishAdded collector: Dr Wilhelm Olbers Focke
29/04/2012sheepishAdded collector: (Rogers)

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.


User comments about this sheet

jcqstewart@... wrote
My first attempt - so just wondering if it's OK


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SteveH



Joined: 13 Feb 2012
Posts: 29

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Focke and Rogers after the taxon name is the authority for the name, and you don't need to do anything with them. They aren't the collectors, on this specimen the collector isn't named, it should come in the 'Leg' line.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    herbariaunited.org Forum Index -> Herbarium sheet discussion All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group