Feedback request: Rubus tardus (17031)

[jcqstewart@...]

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #335391

Taxon:	Rosaceae: Rubus tardus W.C.R. Watson det. Beverley Alan Miles 1964
Filed in taxon folder:	Rosaceae: Rubus tardus W.C.R. Watson
Collection date:	16/7/1933
Locality:	Great Britain, VC17 Surrey, Mitcham Common, TQ26
ex herb:	Charles Avery
Institution:	South London Botanical Institute (SLBI)
Image:
fruits/flowers:	mature flowers
notes:	Pencilled comment on sheet - "Yes! B A Miles 1964" - and a number - 11/309

Inferred details are marked.

Documented by sheepish on 23^rd April 2012.

Edit history

date	user	change
26/04/2012	steveh	Deleted determination (orig): Rubus tardus
26/04/2012	steveh	Added determination (det): Rubus tardus on 1964
26/04/2012	steveh	Deleted collector: W Wats
26/04/2012	steveh	Added determiner: Beverley Alan Miles
29/04/2012	sheepish	Deleted note: Pencilled comment on sheet - looks like "Yes! B Athlis 1964" - and a number - 11/309
29/04/2012	sheepish	Added note: Pencilled comment on sheet - "Yes! B A Miles 1964" - and a number - 11/309

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.

User comments about this sheet

jcqstewart@... wrote

What does the number in pencil mean? Does it need to be included?

[SteveH]

The W Wats after the taxon name is the botanical authority for the name and doesn't have to be included.
The "Yes B A Miles" I think indicates that the ID has been confirmed by B A Miles. Click on the ... symbol after the taxon name to get another menu and choose 'confirmed by'.
I'm not sure about the number, very few other specimens which have been documented seem to show them so I leave them out.
I'm a beginner myself, so a more experienced contributor might want to correct me.

[oldnick]

I agree, correct