This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.
Documented by johnhawksford on 29th September 2007.
Edit history
date | user | change |
---|
29/09/2007 | johnhawksford | Replaced note: A confusing sheet. I'm sure that it isn't Dactylis glomerata! It could be Deschampsia flexuosa as on the original label, but it is hard to tell from a photograph. Handwritten notes could imply something to the effect that it was collected at Radlett?? by |
10/08/2012 | mossysal | Added determination (orig): Dactylis glomerata |
10/08/2012 | mossysal | Deleted determination (orig): Dactylis glomerata |
10/08/2012 | mossysal | Added determination (orig): Deschampsia flexuosa |
10/08/2012 | mossysal | Deleted blank locality |
10/08/2012 | mossysal | Added locality: GB VC20 Radlett |
10/08/2012 | mossysal | Added collector: C H Cops |
10/08/2012 | mossysal | Deleted note: A confusing sheet. I'm sure that it isn't Dactylis glomerata as already entered on the form! It could be Deschampsia flexuosa as on the original label, but it is hard to tell from a photograph. Handwritten notes could imply something to the effect that it was collected at Radlett?? by C.H. Cops?? |
N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.
Log-in to edit this sheet.
User comments about this sheet
- mossysal wrote
- A confusing sheet. I'm sure that it isn't Dactylis glomerata as already entered on the form! It could be Deschampsia flexuosa as on the original label, but it is hard to tell from a photograph. Handwritten notes could imply something to the effect that it was collected at Radlett?? by C.H. Cops??