Feedback request: Galium boreale (22913)

[annaorlando]

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #345972

Taxon:	Galium boreale L. ("Northern Bedstraw")
Filed in taxon folder:	Galium boreale L. ("Northern Bedstraw")
Collected by:	Dr Gillis
Collection date:	to 1830
Locality:	Great Britain, VC88 Mid Perthshire, Loch Tay, NN53, Banks of Loch Tay at the foot of Ben Lawers
ex herb:	Robert Russell Hutchinson Croydon Natural History and Scientific Society Sir John Joseph Bennett
Institution:	South London Botanical Institute (SLBI)
Image:
collector's number:	4204
fruits/flowers:	mature flowers

Inferred details are marked.

Documented by annaorlando on 7^th November 2012.

Edit history

date	user	change
07/11/2012	mossysal	Added collection date: - 1830

Specimen #345973

Taxon:	Galium boreale L. ("Northern Bedstraw")
Filed in taxon folder:	Galium boreale L. ("Northern Bedstraw")
Collected by:	Mr Roberts Leyland
Collection date:	to 1830
Locality:	Great Britain, VC70 Cumberland, Derwent Water, NY22
ex herb:	Robert Russell Hutchinson Croydon Natural History and Scientific Society Sir John Joseph Bennett
Institution:	South London Botanical Institute (SLBI)
collector's number:	4203
fruits/flowers:	mature flowers

Inferred details are marked.

Documented by annaorlando on 7^th November 2012.

Edit history

date	user	change
07/11/2012	mossysal	Added collection date: - 1830

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.

User comments about this sheet

annaorlando wrote

No date

[mossysal]

We can only record what's there, I would think. There is a date against J J Bennett of 1830 - maybe it would be logical to put that as the 'to' date?