View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Roger Horton
Joined: 02 Oct 2012 Posts: 1545 Location: Cambridge, UK
|
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 9:46 am Post subject: Feedback request: Galium aparine (23323) |
|
|
This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.
Documented by xmhcman on 7th December 2012. Documented by xmhcman on 12th December 2012. Log-in to edit this sheet.
User comments about this sheet - xmhcman wrote
- Another example of a 'seed' packet from JE Little
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
oldnick
Joined: 09 Oct 2009 Posts: 5472
|
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Since quite full info is given, this should be entered; as seeds amount to a specimen |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Roger Horton
Joined: 02 Oct 2012 Posts: 1545 Location: Cambridge, UK
|
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Initially I always recorded suck packets, if they had full information, as a separate specimen and as 'seeds/fruits', but then read that what they contained was 'plant parts' and became unsure. Is there a consensus please as to how to record? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tom Humphrey Site Admin
Joined: 04 Jul 2005 Posts: 1298 Location: Wallingford, UK
|
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would record them, as they probably represent a valid record of a plant (and where there is doubt the original specimen could be checked later) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Roger Horton
Joined: 02 Oct 2012 Posts: 1545 Location: Cambridge, UK
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Done! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|