Feedback request: Silene vulgaris subsp. vulgaris (1715)

[hallucigenia]

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #310760

Taxon:	Caryophyllaceae: Silene vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Filed in taxon folder:	Caryophyllaceae: Silene vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Collected by:	Mr Archibald Sim Montgomrey
Collection date:	6/1916
Locality:	Great Britain, VC33 East Gloucestershire, Noverton, SO92, Noverton Hill
Institution:	Gloucester City Museum (GLR)
Accession number:	1715
Image:
fruits/flowers:	mature flowers

Inferred details are marked.

Documented by hallucigenia on 16^th November 2010.

Edit history

date	user	change
21/11/2010	hallucigenia	Deleted collector: Mr A S Montgomery
21/11/2010	hallucigenia	Added collector: Archibald Sim Montgomrey
17/08/2016	chrisu	Deleted locality: GB VC33 Cheltenham, Norton Hill near'
17/08/2016	chrisu	Added locality: GB VC33 Noverton, Noverton Hill

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.

User comments about this sheet

hallucigenia wrote

Another of Mr A S Montgomery's I think.

[Chris Liffen]

or Montgomrey
see http://herbariaunited.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5516

[hallucigenia]

I am not saying you are wrong indeed the only hint of collector is "Mont" written in pencil, presumably by the archiver on most if not all sheets.
However one sheet at least is signed http://herbariaunited.org/specimen/254980/, which may be the same.
But having looked at those specimens of Montgomrey the style/hand is the same, which poses a problem are there two collectors with the same initials one A.S.Montgomery one A.S. Montgomrey, or more likely one collector and a 'typo' / 'error' in the past has caused twins! Whichever it is the sheets need collating under the correct name, once this is decided.
There is no database entry for 'ery' but one for 'rey' the more likely I feel, if we agree I will collate all the sheets done so far under one name.
Let me know on this.
Chris

[Chris Liffen]

see http://herbariaunited.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5507&highlight=montgomrey
Chris