help | home | search messages | profile

@home Message Board

Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages
Feedback request: Mentha aquatica x spicata = M. x piperita (1993.80.6146)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    herbariaunited.org Forum Index -> Herbarium sheet discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
wenben



Joined: 24 Mar 2007
Posts: 49

PostPosted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 11:23 pm    Post subject: Feedback request: Mentha aquatica x spicata = M. x piperita Reply with quote

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #232182

Taxon:Lamiaceae: Mentha aquatica x spicata = M. x piperita L. ("Peppermint")
Filed in taxon folder:Lamiaceae: Mentha aquatica x spicata = M. x piperita L. ("Peppermint")
Collection date:13/10/1934
Locality:Great Britain, VC83 Midlothian, Loganbank, NT2462, river bank
ex herb:University of Exeter
Institution:National Museums Liverpool (LIV)
Image:Mentha aquatica x spicata = M. x piperita herbarium specimen from Loganbank, VC83 Midlothian in 1934.
fruits/flowers:mature flowers

Documented by wenben on 24th March 2007.

Edit history

dateuserchange
20/10/2011oldnickDeleted locality: GB VC83 Loganbank, river bank
20/10/2011oldnickAdded locality: GB VC83 Loganbank, [N of Penicuik] river bank NT2462
22/03/2013chrisuDeleted locality: GB VC83 Loganbank, [N of Penicuik] river bank NT2462
22/03/2013chrisuAdded locality: GB VC83 Loganbank, river bank NT2462
22/03/2013chrisuDeleted collector: (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew)
22/03/2013chrisuDeleted provenance: (Liverpool Museum Herbarium)

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.


User comments about this sheet

wenben wrote
I assume that K refers to Kew as there was no collector name? The date is also 13/10/34 which could be 1834? I have put 1934 but you may want to change it.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
katy t



Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dear Ian,

I don't know what the K refers to but Kew is probably correct. I think you're right about 1934, if the label was 1834 it's unlikely it would be printed and the handwriting doesn't look very 1834 either.

Thank you.

Kind regards,

Leander
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oldnick



Joined: 09 Oct 2009
Posts: 5472

PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 8:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looks like M spicata ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oldnick



Joined: 09 Oct 2009
Posts: 5472

PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 8:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe not - see http://herbariaunited.org/specimen/234954/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    herbariaunited.org Forum Index -> Herbarium sheet discussion All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group