Feedback request: Phyllitis scolopendrium (345)

[lowfatspread]

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #258136

Taxon:	Aspleniaceae: Phyllitis scolopendrium (L.) Newman ("Hart's-tongue")
Filed in taxon folder:	Aspleniaceae: Phyllitis scolopendrium (L.) Newman ("Hart's-tongue")
Collected by:	Mr Harold Stuart Thompson
Collection date:	1/1906
Locality:	Great Britain, VC6,VC8, Road, ST85, Near Road west of Bridgewater
ex herb:	Mr Harold Stuart Thompson
Institution:	University of Birmingham (BIRM)
Image:
notes:	all of these (on 2 sheets) from the same root qgroom responded the other sheet is BIRM.342

Inferred details are marked.

Documented by lowfatspread on 26^th April 2008.

Checked by hallucigenia

Edit history

date	user	change
05/05/2008	lowfatspread	Replaced note: all of these (on 2 sheets) from the same root
18/10/2010	hallucigenia	Deleted locality: GB VC5,VC6 Bridgwater, near "road" (W. of B'Water) [illegible]
18/10/2010	hallucigenia	Added locality: GB VC6,VC8 Road, Near Road west of Bridgewater [illegible]
18/10/2010	hallucigenia	Added collector: Mr Harold Stuart Thompson

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.

User comments about this sheet

lowfatspread wrote

is other sheet available....
is it bridgewater?

[Tom Humphrey]

I think you're probably right that B'water = Bridgewater, but hopefully someone with local knowledge may follow-up this post.

I'm not sure if the second sheet is available. In cases where two sheets were clearly part of the same collection and have been clipped together, then I tended to photograph both and load them on to the system as a single record - in which case the documentation form would indicate that there were two images. In this case if the second sheet exists in the B'ham collection, then it has been filed separately and should appear as a separate record - we'll know once all the P. scolopendrium have been documented. (very few P. scolopendrium sheets from BIRM have been documented so far)

If things work correctly then then the system will notice that the two specimen pages are related and will add links between them (as 'related specimens').

[qgroom]

I found your other sheet. It is Sheet BIRM.342. It doesn't provide much more information, but I'm fairly sure it is the Bridgewater in Somerset.

[lowfatspread]

thanks