Feedback request: Rubus informifolius (16575)

[dawn nelson]

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #334768

Taxon:	Rosaceae: Rubus pallidus Weihe. confirmed by David Elliston Allen 1/1998
Filed in taxon folder:	Rosaceae: Rubus informifolius Edees
Collected by:	Mr James Walter White
Collection date:	8/10/1888
Locality:	Great Britain, VC6 North Somerset, Holcombe, Edford, ST6749, Moist border of wood near Edford [S of Midsomer Norton]
ex herb:	Mr James Walter White Botanical Exchange Club of The British Isles
Institution:	South London Botanical Institute (SLBI)
Image:
fruits/flowers:	seeds/fruits

Documented by dawn nelson on 4^th April 2012.

Checked by oldnick

Edit history

date	user	change
05/12/2013	hewitt.j.h@bt	Deleted determination (orig): Rubus informifolius
05/12/2013	hewitt.j.h@bt	Added determination (orig): Rubus pallidus
05/12/2013	hewitt.j.h@bt	Deleted locality: GB VC5,VC6 Edford, Moist border of wood near '
05/12/2013	hewitt.j.h@bt	Added locality: GB VC5,VC6 Edford, Moist border of wood near'
28/10/2014	oldnick	Deleted determination (orig): Rubus pallidus
28/10/2014	oldnick	Deleted determination (det): Rubus pallidus on 1/1998
28/10/2014	oldnick	Added determination (conf): Rubus pallidus on 1/1998
28/10/2014	oldnick	Deleted locality: GB VC5,VC6 Edford, Moist border of wood near'
28/10/2014	oldnick	Added locality: GB VC6 Holcombe, Edford, Moist border of wood near Edford [S of Midsomer Norton] ST6749 (place)
28/10/2014	oldnick	Deleted determiner: Dr David Elliston Allen
28/10/2014	oldnick	Added determiner: Dr David Elliston Allen

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.

User comments about this sheet

dawn nelson wrote

is there a dispute of |ID here D E Allen seems to think it is R pallidus, and that is what the label says? R informifolius is a different species.