Feedback request: Rubus marshallii (16860)

[tm2383]

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #335321

Taxon:	Rosaceae: Rubus marshallii Focke & W.M. Rogers det. William Moyle Rogers
Filed in taxon folder:	Rosaceae: Rubus marshallii Focke & W.M. Rogers
Collected by:	John Gilbert Baker
Collection date:	20/8/1885
Locality:	Great Britain, VC17 Surrey, Leith Hill, TQ14
ex herb:	Mr William Hadden Beeby
Institution:	South London Botanical Institute (SLBI)
Image:
fruits/flowers:	no flowers

Inferred details are marked.

Documented by tm2383 on 22^nd April 2012.

Edit history

date	user	change
26/04/2012	steveh	Deleted determination (orig): Rubus marshallii
26/04/2012	steveh	Added determination (det): Rubus marshallii
26/04/2012	steveh	Deleted provenance: exherb John Gilbert Baker
26/04/2012	steveh	Added collector: John Gilbert Baker
26/04/2012	steveh	Added determiner: Rev William Moyle Rogers
26/04/2012	steveh	Deleted collection date: 20/8/1883
26/04/2012	steveh	Added collection date: 20/8/1885

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.

User comments about this sheet

tm2383 wrote

Not sure whether Beeby or Baker refer to the herbarium or the collector. This is not made clear on the label.

[SteveH]

I'm a newcomer myself but this might help. The stamp Herb W H Beeby indicates the herbarium. I would think J G Baker is the collector as he has signed the notes. The letter in front of his name may be 'l' signifying 'legit' (collected).
The identity seems to have been determined by W. M Rogers and this goes in after the taxon name (click on the ... symbol to get an additional menu and choose identified by).

[tm2383]

Thanks for the information. That makes a lot of sense. I'll update the record.

thanks,

tim

[tm2383]

I actually can't update the record. When I click edit there is a note saying that the specimen has been allocated to another user. Is this normal or have I done something wrong?


Tim

[SteveH]

That's funny, I haven't seen that before. However, it looks as though the allocation ends today.