This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.
Documented by CLL following initial work by kpatmore on 3rd June 2012.
Edit history
date | user | change |
---|
03/06/2012 | CLL | Deleted determiner's note: Author citation as on label: Baker |
03/06/2012 | CLL | Added determiner's note: Author citation as on label: Baker |
03/10/2012 | oldnick | Deleted determiner's note: Author citation as on label: Baker |
03/10/2012 | oldnick | Added determiner's note: Author citation as on label: Baker |
Documented by CLL on 3rd June 2012.
Edit history
N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.
Log-in to edit this sheet.
User comments about this sheet
- kpatmore wrote
- This sheet includes two separate specimens with different collectors and localities. I notice no barcodes have been used to differentiate. How are mixed collections like this dealt with by SLBI? I have entered data for the top specimen, but not the bottom one. Any other feedback on quality of data entered according to SLBI standards also much appreciated, especially since the collector number appears to have been changed at a later date so I was unsure which to use. Thanks, Kristina.