Feedback request: Allium oleraceum (29640)

[kenbalkow]

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #356305

Taxon:	Liliaceae: Allium oleraceum L. ("Field Garlic")
Filed in taxon folder:	Liliaceae: Allium oleraceum L. ("Field Garlic")
Collected by:	Henry Franklin Parsons
Collection date:	8/1869
Locality:	Great Britain, VC16 West Kent, Widmore, TQ4269
ex herb:	Croydon Natural History and Scientific Society Henry Franklin Parsons
Institution:	South London Botanical Institute (SLBI)
Image:
fruits/flowers:	mature flowers

Documented by kenbalkow on 29^th January 2013.

Edit history

date	user	change
30/01/2013	kenbalkow	Added locality: GB VC16 Widmore TQ4269 (place) [illegible]
30/01/2013	kenbalkow	Added collector: Henry Franklin Parsons
30/01/2013	kenbalkow	Added provenance: exherb Henry Franklin Parsons
30/01/2013	kenbalkow	Deleted locality: [illegible]

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.

User comments about this sheet

kenbalkow wrote

No collector, site illegible

[oldnick]

This is herb. H F Parsons. The site is spelt Wilmore/Milmore, Kent, but I reckon must be Widmore near Bromley TQ4269, see http://herbariaunited.org/specimen/328683/ from adjacent Bickley

[Chris Liffen]

Had been wondering about this one ...... could be an open d there as you suggest.

[chrisu]

seems to be exactly the same http://herbariaunited.org/specimen/355597/
has it been entered into the system twice?

[Tom Humphrey]

Yes, sorry it looks as though it has.

I thought I'd sorted out that problem...

I'll investigate this again and let you know how many specimens this affects (a very small number I think).

regards,

Tom

[Tom Humphrey]

It appears that ~27 sheets of Alium carinatum and A. oleraceum were photographed twice (whole folders got repeated).

Almost all the duplicates had been documented already unfortunately, but I've taken a couple of the remaining ones out of circulation.

sorry about the wasted effort.