View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Roger Horton
Joined: 02 Oct 2012 Posts: 1545 Location: Cambridge, UK
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 5:29 pm Post subject: Feedback request: Viola riviniana x reichenbachiana = V. x b |
|
|
This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.
Documented by hallucigenia on 1st August 2011. Checked by CLL Log-in to edit this sheet.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Roger Horton
Joined: 02 Oct 2012 Posts: 1545 Location: Cambridge, UK
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 5:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Label says '(t Murbeck)' rather like sheet 322542 which has 't S Murbeck'. Both collected during May 1887 in Surrey. Is this Beeby mistranscribing 'Svante Samuel Murbeck' (1859-1946)? This collector has just turned up in his home country Sweden, sheet 358062 where he appears as 'Sv. Murbeck' (wonderful label including det. Richard von Wettstein)? 'Svante Murbeck' is named on yet another sheet [url='http://herbariaunited.org/specimen/329502/] 329502 [/url] in what may be his own hand.
Anyone know if Murbeck visited Beeby please? Are we justified in combining these under one collector? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
oldnick
Joined: 09 Oct 2009 Posts: 5472
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
t quite likely = teste? 'see letter' suggests Beeby had posted a specimen to him for identification |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Roger Horton
Joined: 02 Oct 2012 Posts: 1545 Location: Cambridge, UK
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Nick! So I guess these should be 'confirmed by' Murbeck, and no suggestion he actually visited Surrey. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chris Liffen
Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Posts: 1850
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
for interest
J of Bot Vol 32
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|