View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
David Price
Joined: 05 Jul 2007 Posts: 2214
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 2:33 pm Post subject: Feedback request: Orchis laxiflora (14015) |
|
|
This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.
Documented by dawn nelson on 29th December 2011. Edit historyDocumented by dawn nelson on 29th December 2011. Edit historyN.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names. Log-in to edit this sheet.
User comments about this sheet - wonastow wrote
- Could this Hartlepool spmn really be Orchis [now Anacamptis] laxiflora? I have never seen any reference to it in print (e.g. Simpson's Index). Was ballast obtained by grubbing up the Jersey meadows?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Roger Horton
Joined: 02 Oct 2012 Posts: 1545 Location: Cambridge, UK
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is a reference to it in The Student's Flora of the British Islands by Joseph Dalton Hooker p. 389:
I guess the ballast could have come in from anywhere that received coal from Hartlepool. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David Price
Joined: 05 Jul 2007 Posts: 2214
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, we live and learn.
In C19th Hartlepool was a substantial timber importer. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chris Liffen
Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Posts: 1850
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
and
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chris Liffen
Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Posts: 1850
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
or there is the suggestion of import on wool shoddy
(Orchids of Britain and Ireland: A Field and Site Guide
By Anne Harrap, Simon Harrap) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
oldnick
Joined: 09 Oct 2009 Posts: 5472
|
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 6:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
One often reads enviously of the plants recorded in former times on waste or arable land, or nowadays sees plants come up on development sites that are however quickly landscaped by covering in topsoil. Has anyone tried taking a plough, harrow or spade to any such well-known sites as those described in Hartlepool, where former workings may contain enough seeds to amount to a seed-bank, perhaps without such arable dominants as thistles or sow-thistles? On our local heathland, suppressing the grass cover causes excellent germination, eg where any small log has lain a few months and then been removed. Equally, removing those 'aggressive natives' eg nettle-beds from some of our eutrophicated verges? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Roger Horton
Joined: 02 Oct 2012 Posts: 1545 Location: Cambridge, UK
|
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Perhaps you could start digging at Spion Kop! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chris Liffen
Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Posts: 1850
|
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote
This historic cemetery, formed from a combination of sand dunes and ship ballast, now supports species rich dune grassland with habitat of such quality that is unque in Hartlepool.
Indeed, unique! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|