help | home | search messages | profile

@home Message Board

Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages
Feedback request: Iris foetidissima (4011)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    herbariaunited.org Forum Index -> Herbarium sheet discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Pilaira



Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Posts: 29

PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 11:54 am    Post subject: Feedback request: Iris foetidissima (4011) Reply with quote

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #230399

Taxon:Iridaceae: Iris foetidissima L. ("Stinking Iris")
Filed in taxon folder:Iridaceae: Iris foetidissima L. ("Stinking Iris")
Collected by:Mr Frederick Yorke Brocas
Collection date:6/1849
Locality:Great Britain, VC11 South Hampshire, Winchester, St Cross, SU42
Institution:Manchester Museum (MANCH)
Image:Iris foetidissima herbarium specimen from Winchester, St Cross, VC11 South Hampshire in 1849 by Mr Frederick Yorke Brocas.
fruits/flowers:mature flowers

Inferred details are marked.

Documented by pilaira on 7th January 2007.

Checked by tom humphrey

Edit history

dateuserchange
09/01/2007tom humphreyAdded collection date: 6/1849
26/12/2014oldnickDeleted locality: GB VC11 Winchester (near), St Cross
26/12/2014oldnickAdded locality: GB VC11 Winchester, St Cross

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.


User comments about this sheet

pilaira wrote
the date clearly implies June 1849 - a year before Brocas was born! are his dates entered correctly?

tom humphrey wrote
Brocas' dates were wrong. 1850-1890 was meant to be the floreat date range (rather than dob / dod).


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tom Humphrey
Site Admin


Joined: 04 Jul 2005
Posts: 1298
Location: Wallingford, UK

PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 11:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks very much for reporting this.
Brocas' dates were wrong. 1850-1890 was meant to be the floreat date range (rather than dob / dod).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    herbariaunited.org Forum Index -> Herbarium sheet discussion All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group