Feedback request: Carex divulsa (781723)

[kenbalkow]

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #383987

Taxon:	Cyperaceae: Carex divulsa Stokes
Filed in taxon folder:	Cyperaceae: Carex divulsa Stokes
Collected by:	Henry Trimen
Collection date:	14/6/1866
Locality:	Great Britain, VC21 Middlesex, Staines, TQ07
ex herb:	Henry Trimen
Institution:	Natural History Museum (BM)
Accession number:	781723
Image:
Filing note:	please document as separate specimens

Inferred details are marked.

Documented by kenbalkow on 16^th January 2015.

Edit history

date	user	change
16/01/2015	tom humphrey	Added collector: Henry Trimen
16/01/2015	tom humphrey	Added provenance: exherb Henry Trimen
16/01/2015	tom humphrey	Deleted collection date: 14/6/1966
16/01/2015	tom humphrey	Added collection date: 14/6/1866

Specimen #384000

Taxon:	Cyperaceae: Carex divulsa Stokes
Filed in taxon folder:	Cyperaceae: Carex divulsa Stokes
Collected by:	Henry Trimen
Collection date:	20/5/1862
Locality:	Great Britain, VC20 Hertfordshire, East Barnet, TQ29, hedgebank
ex herb:	Henry Trimen
Institution:	Natural History Museum (BM)
Accession number:	781723
Filing note:	please document as separate specimens

Inferred details are marked.

Documented by tom humphrey on 16^th January 2015.

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.

User comments about this sheet

kenbalkow wrote

Who is H J?

[Tom Humphrey]

There's a 'Trimen' stamp in the top-left corner, so I assume that the initials are H.T.

There's only a single barcode on the sheet, so I've documented both specimens under the single number (the museum will hopefully assign another barcode later), unfortunately the photo misses off details of the third specimen.