Feedback request: Salix triandra x viminalis = S. x mollissima (HU2007-01250191)

[keith barnett]

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #236935

Taxon:	Salicaceae: Salix triandra x viminalis = S. x mollissima Hoffm. ex Elwert ("Sharp-stipuled Willow") named by Peter Derek Sell 30/1/1992
Filed in taxon folder:	Salicaceae: Salix triandra x viminalis = S. x mollissima Hoffm. ex Elwert ("Sharp-stipuled Willow")
Collected by:	Peter Derek Sell J Gina Murrell
Collection date:	30/1/1992
Locality:	Great Britain, VC29 Cambridgeshire, Over, TL363714, Osier beds along dyke, both sides of the road, not far from Great Ouse
Institution:	Cambridge University (CGE)
Image:
fruits/flowers:	no flowers
Tags:	collectors number: Sell 91/240

Documented by toribird79 on 24^th September 2007.

Checked by keith barnett

Edit history

date	user	change
06/11/2008	keith barnett	Deleted locality: GB VC29 Over, Osier beds along dyke, both sides of the road, not far from Great Ouse, Over, Cambs TL363714
06/11/2008	keith barnett	Added locality: GB VC29 Over, Osier beds along dyke, both sides of the road, not far from Great Ouse, Over, Cambs No. Sell 91/240 TL363714
06/11/2008	keith barnett	Deleted provenance: exherb (Cambridge University)
06/11/2008	<system> (minor automatic edit)	Deleted provenance: exherb (Botanical Society of The British Isles)
06/11/2008	<system> (minor automatic edit)	Added provenance: exherb (Botanical Society of The British Isles)
06/11/2008	tom humphrey	Deleted locality: GB VC29 Over, Osier beds along dyke, both sides of the road, not far from Great Ouse, Over, Cambs No. Sell 91/240 TL363714
06/11/2008	tom humphrey	Added locality: GB VC29 Over, Osier beds along dyke, both sides of the road, not far from Great Ouse TL363714
06/11/2008	tom humphrey	Deleted provenance: exherb (Botanical Society of The British Isles)
06/11/2008	tom humphrey	Added tag collectors number: Sell 91/240

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.

User comments about this sheet

keith barnett wrote

on review, is the BSBI entry correct/needed in these cases?

[Tom Humphrey]

No, it's not an exchange club specimen. (recording BSBI etc. is only applicable where the specimen has formed part of an exchange club 'distribution' - this is potentially useful info, as the specimen can be compared against the corresponding exchange club report)

regards,

Tom