Feedback request: Myosotis arvensis (2745)

[keith barnett]

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #254450

Taxon:	Boraginaceae: Myosotis arvensis (L.) Hill ("Field Forget-me-not")
Filed in taxon folder:	Boraginaceae: Myosotis arvensis (L.) Hill ("Field Forget-me-not")
Collected by:	Prof William Hillhouse
Collection date:	5/5/1876
Locality:	Great Britain, VC30 Bedfordshire, Sandy, TL14, dry bank by wood.
ex herb:	Prof William Hillhouse
Institution:	University of Birmingham (BIRM)
Image:
fruits/flowers:	mature flowers
notes:	Typed label mistranscribed the handwritten label as Lundy.

Inferred details are marked.

Documented by johnhawksford on 6^th April 2008.

Checked by keith barnett

Edit history

date	user	change
04/03/2009	keith barnett	Deleted locality: GB VC4 Lundy Island, Dry bank by wood.
04/03/2009	keith barnett	Added locality: GB VC4 Lundy Island, dry bank by wood.
04/03/2009	<system> (minor automatic edit)	Deleted collector: William Hillhouse
04/03/2009	<system> (minor automatic edit)	Deleted provenance: exherb William Hillhouse
04/03/2009	<system> (minor automatic edit)	Added collector: Prof William Hillhouse
04/03/2009	<system> (minor automatic edit)	Added provenance: exherb Prof William Hillhouse
25/04/2010	tom humphrey	Deleted note: Six plants!
25/04/2010	tom humphrey	Added note: Typed label mistranscribed the handwritten label as Lundy.
25/04/2010	tom humphrey	Deleted locality: GB VC4 Lundy Island, dry bank by wood.
25/04/2010	tom humphrey	Added locality: GB VC30 Sandy, dry bank by wood.

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.

User comments about this sheet

keith barnett wrote

on review, I assume the word is indeed 'Lundy', not 'sandy'?

[John Hughes]

The second letter looks much more like an "u" so, by inference, the first letter is an "L" but I agree it could just as easily be an "S".