Feedback request: Mentha aquatica x spicata = M. x piperita (HU2007-01230253)

[qgroom]

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #233309

Taxon:	Lamiaceae: Mentha aquatica x spicata = M. x piperita L. ("Peppermint") confirmed by Rex Alan Henry Graham 28/11/1950
Filed in taxon folder:	Lamiaceae: Mentha aquatica x spicata = M. x piperita L. ("Peppermint")
Collected by:	Mr Cecil Prescott Hurst Mr George Claridge Druce
Collection date:	1923
Locality:	Great Britain, VC38 Warwickshire, Brailes, SP33
ex herb:	Mr Joseph Edward Little
Institution:	Cambridge University (CGE)
Image:
fruits/flowers:	no flowers

Inferred details are marked.

Documented by qgroom on 1^st May 2007.

Edit history

date	user	change
30/09/2011	mossysal	Deleted determination (orig): Mentha aquatica x spicata = M. x piperita on 28/11/1950
30/09/2011	mossysal	Added determination (conf): Mentha aquatica x spicata = M. x piperita on 28/11/1950
30/09/2011	mossysal	Deleted locality: GB VC7 brailes
30/09/2011	mossysal	Added locality: GB VC38 Brailes
30/09/2011	mossysal	Deleted determiner: Rex Alan Henry Graham
30/09/2011	<system> (minor automatic edit)	Deleted provenance: exherb Joseph Edward Little
30/09/2011	<system> (minor automatic edit)	Added provenance: exherb Mr Joseph Edward Little
30/09/2011	mossysal	Added determiner: Rex Alan Henry Graham

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.

User comments about this sheet

qgroom wrote

There is a Brailes in Warwickshire, but not in Wiltshire?

[mossysal]

I think this must be a mistake and the Warwicks one is meant?