This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.
Documented by mikedaps on 20th January 2010.
Checked by mossysal
Edit history
N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.
Log-in to edit this sheet.
User comments about this sheet
- mikedaps wrote
- Had thought it read "F ? Druce" and there's a specimen http://herbariaunited.org/specimen/285572/ from 1884 ascribed to a F Druce.(Juncus inflexus x effusus = J. x diffusus. GB, VC23 Oxfordshire, North Leigh.F Druce) But this proves to be G C's signature used on all his original labels that I've looked at so far.
What's the policy on correcting, where more or less certain, other completed specimens like 285572? Does one just edit and note the rational which will then get reviewed? Mike d'A