Feedback request: Salix fragilis (34694)

[oldnick]

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #306322

Taxon:	Salicaceae: Salix fragilis var. decipiens (Hoffm.) W.D.J.Koch
Filed in taxon folder:	Salicaceae: Salix fragilis var. decipiens (Hoffm.) W.D.J.Koch
Collected by:	Rev. Augustin Ley
Collection date:	22/8/1881
Locality:	Great Britain, VC69 Westmorland, Foxfield, SD48, Foxfield Junction
ex herb:	Rev. Augustin Ley
Institution:	University of Birmingham (BIRM)
Image:
fruits/flowers:	no flowers

Inferred details are marked.

Documented by oldnick on 23^rd August 2010.

Checked by mossysal

Edit history

date	user	change
17/10/2011	mossysal	Deleted locality: GB VC69 Foxfield, Foxfield Junction, Lake, Lancashire
17/10/2011	mossysal	Added locality: GB VC69 Foxfield, Foxfield Junction

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.

User comments about this sheet

oldnick wrote

I have located Foxfield in Westm, and it is on a railway; but does not have a lake, and is not in Lancashire ...?

[Chris Liffen]

Does it not read 'Lake Lancashire' and to to refer back to Tom H on another sheet:
"Lake Lancashire is an archaic reference to Westmorland (or possibly just VC 69b - I'm not certain). So in general 'Lake Lancashire' should be taken to mean 69 rather than VC60. For the purposes of herb@home (partly for the sake of simplicity) no distinction has been drawn between VC69 and VC69b."

Regards
Chris