geoff toone
Joined: 03 May 2010 Posts: 52
|
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 1:04 pm Post subject: Feedback request: Viola (4865) |
|
|
This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.
Documented by oldnick on 17th August 2011. Edit historyN.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names. Log-in to edit this sheet.
User comments about this sheet - geoff toone wrote
- This record is mentioned in Townsend [1884, 2nd Ed., 1904], Fl of Hants incl. the IW. as (district)V, (2) - "Var. V. banatica, Kit.", "Field outside Steyn wood, Bembridge 1900; Miss C. Palmer" (on the distribution DB as record/2cd4p9h.3622dr). Also as synonyms in Rayner, [1929] Suppl., to Fl. of Hants incl IW = Viola tricolor var. vectensis F. N. Williams • ÷)(Distrib' DB record/2cd4p9h.35asv8)
V, (2) - Bembridge; Miss Palmer, (Rep. B.E.C.., 1926). (This may be the same as Miss Palmer's 1900 rec., in Townsend). The authors of Fl of the IW [1978], Bevis et al, consider this to be the hybrid arvensis x tricolor (V. x contempta, Jordan.) and state that this has been recorded elsewhere in vc10, but not V. tri ssp tri.]. There are recent confirmed records of V. tricolor ssp tricolor. This still needs determining.
|
|