View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Roger Horton
Joined: 02 Oct 2012 Posts: 1545 Location: Cambridge, UK
|
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:34 pm Post subject: Feedback request: Potamogeton gramineus (44390) |
|
|
This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.
Documented by xmhcman on 20th April 2015. Log-in to edit this sheet.
User comments about this sheet - xmhcman wrote
- Any suggestions for site name please? Woods was in Norfolk this month, but typically collected within a short distance of Lewes.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
oldnick
Joined: 09 Oct 2009 Posts: 5472
|
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 7:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
I also can't read this as any place name at all. Sunart - completely doubtful; if the Norfolk label on http://herbariaunited.org/specimen/328508/ were imaginatively read as Hoveton, that would suggest the Norfolk Broads - and this is an aquatic species |
|
Back to top |
|
|
oldnick
Joined: 09 Oct 2009 Posts: 5472
|
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
I see that on either side of this date, Woods managed to be in France, at 'FR, Loiret, Centre, Saint-Cyr-en-Val, Orleans' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Roger Horton
Joined: 02 Oct 2012 Posts: 1545 Location: Cambridge, UK
|
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2015 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
South of Paris and some 40km from other French locations visited by Woods in the summer of 1843 is Forêt de Sénart (Essonne). So perhaps it's Sénart.
As for the Norfolk specimen the label isn't written by Woods, but, most likely by Townsend, and could be a mistranscription. Woods only other Norfolk (East or West) specimen appears to be earlier in the year on 8/4/1843 from Bedingham. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
oldnick
Joined: 09 Oct 2009 Posts: 5472
|
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Au contraire, it now appears that at the time, Woods collected around the southern edges of Paris |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|