Feedback request: Filago vulgaris (24168)

[oldnick]

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #349455

Taxon:	Asteraceae: Filago vulgaris Lam. ("Common Cudweed")
Filed in taxon folder:	Asteraceae: Filago vulgaris Lam. ("Common Cudweed")
Collected by:	Mr Edward Charles Wallace
Collection date:	25/6/1933
Locality:	Great Britain, VC13 West Sussex, Coates Common, TQ0017, Sandy field by Coates Common 'Surrey'
ex herb:	Mr Job Edward Lousley Mr Edward Charles Wallace
Institution:	South London Botanical Institute (SLBI)
Image:
Filing note:	Filago germanica

Documented by shaw30 on 8^th December 2012.

Edit history

date	user	change
01/08/2015	oldnick	Deleted locality: GB VC17 Coates Common
01/08/2015	oldnick	Added locality: GB VC13 Coates Common, Sandy field by Coates Common 'Surrey' TQ0017 (place)

Specimen #349456

Taxon:	Asteraceae: Filago vulgaris Lam. ("Common Cudweed")
Filed in taxon folder:	Asteraceae: Filago vulgaris Lam. ("Common Cudweed")
Collected by:	Mr Job Edward Lousley
Collection date:	11/7/1931
Locality:	Great Britain, VC26 West Suffolk, Freckenham, TL67, Heath near
ex herb:	Mr Job Edward Lousley
Institution:	South London Botanical Institute (SLBI)
Filing note:	Filago germanica

Documented by shaw30 on 8^th December 2012.

Edit history

date	user	change
14/02/2013	oldnick	Added locality: GB VC26 Freckenham, Heath near TL67 (place)
14/02/2013	oldnick	Deleted locality: GB VC26 Freckenham

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.

User comments about this sheet

oldnick wrote

Coates Common is on the W Sussex / Hampshire boundary, and as Wallace has other collections from around that area same date, he presumably wrote 'Surrey' by mistake