Feedback request: Narthecium ossifragum (29934)

[kenbalkow]

This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.

Specimen #355704

Taxon:	Liliaceae: Narthecium ossifragum (L.) Huds. ("Bog Asphodel")
Filed in taxon folder:	Liliaceae: Narthecium ossifragum (L.) Huds. ("Bog Asphodel")
Collected by:	Mr Joseph Edward Little
Collection date:	13/8/1925
Locality:	Great Britain, VC28 West Norfolk, Roydon Common, TF6822
ex herb:	Mr Joseph Edward Little
Institution:	South London Botanical Institute (SLBI)
Image:
fruits/flowers:	mature flowers

Documented by kenbalkow on 25^th January 2013.

Checked by mossysal

Edit history

date	user	change
27/01/2013	mossysal	Deleted locality: GB VC28 Roydon Common TF62 (place)
27/01/2013	mossysal	Added locality: GB VC28 Roydon Common TF6822 (place)

Specimen #355705

Taxon:	Liliaceae: Narthecium ossifragum (L.) Huds. ("Bog Asphodel")
Filed in taxon folder:	Liliaceae: Narthecium ossifragum (L.) Huds. ("Bog Asphodel")
Collected by:	Hugh Neville Dixon Harold Goodman Dixon
Collection date:	8/1879
Locality:	Great Britain, VC49 Caernarvonshire, Llanberis, SH56
communicated:	Leslie Beeching Hall
ex herb:	Hugh Neville Dixon
Institution:	South London Botanical Institute (SLBI)
fruits/flowers:	mature flowers

Inferred details are marked.

Documented by kenbalkow on 25^th January 2013.

Checked by mossysal

Edit history

date	user	change
07/10/2014	xmhcman	Deleted collector: Mrs H (Anne) Dixon
07/10/2014	xmhcman	Added collector: Harold Goodman Dixon
07/10/2014	xmhcman	Added provenance: comm Leslie Beeching Hall

N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.

Log-in to edit this sheet.

User comments about this sheet

kenbalkow wrote

Roydon (W.Norfolk) doesn't seem to be on system

[dawn nelson]

Many places aren't - yet. If it is very clear as in this one, I just add it in as you have. :D

[Tom Humphrey]

I've added it to the drop-down list.

[dawn nelson]

Tom are we doing the right thing? or would it be better to alert you to new locations?

[Tom Humphrey]

It's fine to enter new locations that aren't on the list.

If a place name not on the list crops-up repeatedly then maybe post a note about it, so that it can be added to the drop-down lists.

(e.g. Roydon Common has been used for seven different sheets)