This post was made automatically in response to a request for comment on the documentation form. There is more general info about such requests here.
Documented by keith barnett on 2nd December 2006.
Checked by tom humphrey
Edit history
date | user | change |
---|
10/01/2007 | tom humphrey | Replaced note: sheet marked P4577 and 162.3.3 |
10/01/2007 | <system> (minor automatic edit) | Deleted provenance: exherb (Manchester Museum) |
25/04/2013 | wonastow | Deleted determination (orig): Epipactis purpurata on 1/8/1885 |
25/04/2013 | wonastow | Added determination (orig): Epipactis helleborine on 1/8/1885 |
25/04/2013 | wonastow | Deleted determiner: Rev William Richardson Linton |
25/04/2013 | wonastow | Added determiner: Rev William Richardson Linton |
25/04/2013 | wonastow | Added determiner's note: From BEC Report 1885 - Epipactis violacea, D. Dug. Killarney, Kerry, July and August, 1885.-E. F. and W. R. LINTON. "I should have called both these simply latifolia."-J. G. Baker. |
N.B. reporting of the edit history is currently fairly unclear and misleading. Most edits made to specimens appear as a pair of 'add' and 'delete' entries, which may not be together in the list. There are also often 'minor' edits, which are made automatically (rather than due to user activity), for example to merge synonym names.
Log-in to edit this sheet.
User comments about this sheet
- wonastow wrote
- Isn't this much more likely to be E. helleborine?